Archive / Law Review Articles

RSS feed for this section

Nathalie Martin, Survival in the Face of Scarcity: The Undocumented Immigrant Experience, 58 Ariz. L. Rev. 103 (2016).

Anita Bernstein, The Trouble with Regulating Microfinance, 35 U. Haw. L. Rev. 1, 39 (2013) (defining a tanda as “a credit association formed by individuals in small groups united by acquaintance and a degree of mutual trust”); see also Donald V. Kurtz & Margaret Showman, The Tanda: A Rotating Credit Association in Mexico, 17 Ethnology 65, 67-68 (1978); Nezua, In Tough Economic Times, Will a Tanda Work for You?, El Machete (Aug. 4, 2009, 1:03 PM), http://theunapologeticmexican.org/elmachete/2009/08/04/in-tough-economic-times-will-a-tanda-work-for-you/ (encouraging Mexican Americans who need cash to explore this tradition).
Nathalie Martin, Survival in the Face of Scarcity: The Undocumented Immigrant Experience, 58 Ariz. L. Rev. 103, 107 n. 7 (2016).

Hon. Alberto R. Gonzales & Patrick Glen, Advancing Executive Branch Immigration Policy Through the Attorney General’s Review Authority, 101 Iowa L. Rev. 841 (2016).

See, e.g., Rachel E. Rosenbloom, Remedies for the Wrongly Deported: Territoriality, Finality, and the Significance of Departure, 33 U. Haw. L. Rev. 139, 177 (2010) (discussing Attorney General referral in the context of policy options to revisit the post-departure bar to reopening); Elizabeth A. Rossi, A “Special Track” for Former Child Soldiers: Enacting a “Child Soldier Visa” as an Alternative to Asylum Protection, 31 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 392, 436 (2013) (discussing Attorney General review in the context of eliminating the “social visibility” prong for establishing the existence of a particular social group for purposes of asylum and withholding of removal).
Hon. Alberto R. Gonzales & Patrick Glen, Advancing Executive Branch Immigration Policy Through the Attorney General’s Review Authority, 101 Iowa L. Rev. 841, 897 n.344 (2016).

David Schraub, Unsuspecting, 96 B.U.L. Rev. 261 (2016).

Emp’t Div. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 885-89 (1990) (rejecting the suitability of the compelling state interest test to free exercise claims); see also Ariel Y. Graff, Free Exercise and Hybrid Rights: An Alternative Perspective on the Constitutionality of Same-Sex Marriage Bans, 29 U. Haw. L. Rev. 23, 24 (2006) (describing the holding in Smith as being that “free exercise challenges to neutral, generally applicable laws warrant only rational basis review”).
Davd Schraub, Unsuspecting, 96 B.U.L. Rev. 361, 387 n.131 (2016).